[PAA-Discuss] Getting away with torture
Juli3 at aol.com
Juli3 at aol.com
Thu Nov 15 09:18:26 EST 2012
New York Times editorial 11-14-12
<NYT>Getting Away With To
<NYT
In a decision that ignored a 41-year-old precedent and American
obligations under international law, a United States appeals court has ruled that
American civilians who are tortured by the American military cannot recover
damages from the people responsible.
The 8-to-3 _ruling_
(http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Vance-en-banc-opinion.pdf) by the full United States Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit overturned an important ruling last year by a
three-judge panel of the same court, which held that two Americans who say they were
tortured by American military forces in Iraq could sue former Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld for violating their constitutional rights. That
ruling relied on a landmark 1971 ruling by the Supreme Court known as
_Bivens_
(http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=403&invol=388) , under which government officials could be held accountable for the
intentional mistreatment of American citizens, even if that conduct happened
in a war zone.
Reversing that decision, the full court’s majority incorrectly joined the
Fourth Circuit and the District of Columbia Circuit in rejecting damage
suits against American officials based on torture claims. But its ruling was
much broader and a lot worse. The court held that all military personnel are
exempt from civil liability for breaching civilians’ rights. “Unless
there is a right of action against soldiers and their immediate commanders,” it
said, “there cannot be a right of action for damages against remote
superiors such as former Secretary Rumsfeld.”
The majority talked derisively about lawsuits causing “other problems,
including diverting cabinet officers’ time from management of public affairs
to the defense of their bank accounts.” It is a bizarre argument for a
cabinet officer who developed policies that permitted torture.
Mr. Rumsfeld and other defendants made an argument limited by place: it
was in a war zone that no government or military employee could be sued for
torture. The Seventh Circuit ruling has no limit. Instead, as a dissent in
the case explained, “We leave citizens legally defenseless to serious abuse
or worse by their own government.”
In 2006, the United Nations asked the United States how it would meet its
obligations under a treaty to enforce the international law against
torture. The State Department said American law provides redress, including by
allowing plaintiffs to sue “federal officials directly for damages under
provisions of the U.S. Constitution.”
That is no longer true in cases like this one in the Seventh Circuit. The
military often prosecutes its own malefactors, but if it does not, the
federal courts should be available to protect American liberty. Foreign
citizens can sue foreign officials under American law. Americans can sue foreign
officials. But in the Seventh Circuit, covering Illinois, Indiana and
Wisconsin, Americans are the only citizens who have no remedy under American law
against American officials allegedly responsible for torture.
__._,_.___
_Reply via web post_
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amnestyhouston/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxdnFiamMxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0NzAyNjg1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc2MT
A3OQRtc2dJZAMzMDY0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTM1MjkwNjM5MQ--?act=reply
&messageNum=3064) _Reply to sender _
(mailto:jimmydunne7 at comcast.net?subject=Re:%20Getting%20away%20with%20torture) _Reply to group _
(mailto:amnestyhouston at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re:%20Getting%20away%20with%20torture)
_Start a New Topic_
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amnestyhouston/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXAxM2xkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0NzAyNjg1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc2MTA3O
QRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzNTI5MDYzOTE-) _Messages in this
topic_
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amnestyhouston/message/3064;_ylc=X3oDMTM1YWhjNDlqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0NzAyNjg1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc2MTA3OQRtc2dJZAM
zMDY0BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM1MjkwNjM5MQR0cGNJZAMzMDY0) (1)
Recent Activity:
_Visit Your Group_
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amnestyhouston;_ylc=X3oDMTJmY2h2cDE0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI0NzAyNjg1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc2MTA3OQRzZ
WMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTI5MDYzOTE-)
(http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlczExaGdjBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzI0NzAyNjg1BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc2MTA3OQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM1MjkwNjM5
Mg--)
Switch to: _Text-Only_
(mailto:amnestyhouston-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change Delivery Format: Traditional) , _Daily Digest_
(mailto:amnestyhouston-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email Delivery: Digest) •
_Unsubscribe_
(mailto:amnestyhouston-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe) • _Terms of Use_ (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/) • _Send us
Feedback _ (mailto:ygroupsnotifications at yahoogroups.com?subject=Feedback on the
redesigned individual mail v1)
.
__,_._,___
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20121115/309b5f24/attachment.htm>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list